This paper proposes a framework for assessing the novelty of design problems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality. SAPPhIRE denotes different abstraction levels where S stands for State change, A stands for Action, P stands for Parts, Ph stands for Physical Phenomena, I stands for Input, R stands for oRgan and E stands for Physical Effect. The novelty of a problem is measured as its minimum distance from the problems in a reference problem database. The distance is calculated by comparing the current problem and each reference past problem at the various levels of abstraction in the SAPPhIRE ontology. The basis for comparison is textual similarity. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework, The'current' set of problems associated with an artifact, as collected from its stakeholders, were compared with the'past' set of problems, as collected from patents and other web sources, to assess the novelty of the'current' set. This approach is aimed at providing a better understanding of the degree of novelty of any given set of current problems by comparing them to similar problems available from historical records. By applying such approaches, organizations could effectively prioritize and address emerging problems based on their relative novelty, with positive ramifications on problem-solving and decision-making. Since manual assessment, the current mode of such assessments as reported in the literature, is a tedious process, to reduce time complexity and to afford better applicability for larger sets of problem statements, an automated assessment is proposed and used in this paper.

Representation of systems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality can be an inspirational stimulus in design. However, creating a SAPPhIRE model of a technical or a natural system requires sourcing technical knowledge from multiple technical documents regarding how the system works. This research investigates how to generate technical content accurately relevant to the SAPPhIRE model of causality using a Large Language Model, also called LLM. This paper, which is the first part of the two-part research, presents a method for hallucination suppression using Retrieval Augmented Generating with LLM to generate technical content supported by the scientific information relevant to a SAPPhIRE con-struct. The result from this research shows that the selection of reference knowledge used in providing context to the LLM for generating the technical content is very important. The outcome of this research is used to build a software support tool to generate the SAPPhIRE model of a given technical system.

Representing systems using the SAPPhIRE causality model is found useful in supporting design-by-analogy. However, creating a SAPPhIRE model of artificial or biological systems is an effort-intensive process that requires human experts to source technical knowledge from multiple technical documents regarding how the system works. This research investigates how to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) in creating structured descriptions of systems using the SAPPhIRE model of causality. This paper, the second part of the two-part research, presents a new Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tool for generating information related to SAPPhIRE constructs of artificial systems and reports the results from a preliminary evaluation of the tool's success - focusing on the factual accuracy and reliability of outcomes.

We motivate and propose a suite of simple but effective improvements for concept-to-text generation called SAPPHIRE: Set Augmentation and Post-hoc PHrase Infilling and REcombination. We demonstrate their effectiveness on generative commonsense reasoning, a.k.a. the CommonGen task, through experiments using both BART and T5 models. Through extensive automatic and human evaluation, we show that SAPPHIRE noticeably improves model performance. An in-depth qualitative analysis illustrates that SAPPHIRE effectively addresses many issues of the baseline model generations, including lack of commonsense, insufficient specificity, and poor fluency.